Cultural Differences and Usability Evaluation: Individualistic and Collectivistic Participants Compared

Authors: Hall, Marinda; de Jong, Menno; Steehouder, Michaël

Source: Technical Communication, Volume 51, Number 4, November 2004 , pp. 489-503(15)

Publisher: Society for Technical Communication

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

This article reports a study comparing members of collectivistic/high-context and individualistic/low-context cultures as participants in a Web usability test. Participants’ experiences and their feedback are analyzed for two commonly used evaluation methods: retrospective think-aloud protocols and the plus-minus method. The results show that the plus-minus method reveals considerably fewer user problems when used by members of a collectivistic rather than an individualistic culture. Retrospective think-aloud protocols seem to be less susceptible to cultural bias but differ in two respects: collectivistic participants tend to refrain from comments beyond the user role assigned to them, and they express their comments more indirectly than individualistic participants. Implications for the methodology of usability testing are discussed.

Document Type: Journal article

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$18.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A