Carol Jean Gallo's research on conceptualizing the nature of the Democratic Republic of Congo's (DRC) informal economies is an important contribution to the literature on the DRC and illicit economies worldwide. In this response, I situate Gallo's article within the policy debate about
ending the trade in conflict minerals in eastern Congo. I argue that her work in part explains the disastrous unintended consequences of section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill for Congolese mining communities. In particular it raises questions about the nature of legality and
corruption in the fragile state context. I conclude by recommending that she strengthen her argument through deeper engagement with the conflict minerals literature and by offering specific policy prescriptions on how to build the rule of law in a state in which almost no one has experienced
anything but highly personalized and ineffective governance.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: May 1, 2012
More about this publication?
The St Antony's International Review (STAIR) is the only peer-reviewed journal of international affairs at the University of Oxford. Set up by graduate students of St Antony's College in 2005, the Review has carved out a distinctive niche as a cross-disciplinary outlet for research on the most pressing contemporary global issues, providing a forum in which emerging scholars can publish their work alongside established academics and policymakers. Past contributors include Robert O. Keohane, James N. Rosenau, and Alfred Stepan.