Does the Constitution Provide a Right of Access to Experimental Drugs?
The Abigail Alliance case directly poses the question of whether terminally ill patients have a constitutional right of access to unapproved drugs. The case arose following the death of a young woman from cancer. She had failed standard therapies and had unsuccessfully sought access to an unapproved drug in a clinical trial as a last resort. Following her death, her supporters brought a lawsuit asserting a constitutional right of access to such a product. If such a constitutional right exists, it has serious implications for patients, health care providers, the FDA, insurers, and manufacturers. This article reviews the legal basis for the asserted constitutional right, current case law, and the implications for health care providers.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2007-12-01
More about this publication?
- Journal of Nursing Law was founded to serve the needs of practicing nurses in hospitals, clinics, schools, and elsewhere for solid practical advice on the legal and ethical issues that influence their jobs.
- Membership Information
- Free Sample Issue
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites