Skip to main content

Free Content FEATURE Issues in Creativity and Madness Part One: Ancient Questions, Modern Answers

Download Article:
(PDF 292.8359375 kb)
This brief article addresses the widespread, ancient, and cherished belief that creative individuals are far more prone to pathological disturbance than the non-creative. The original research by Kay Jamison and Nancy Andreasen, which for three decades has been considered scientific "proof of this belief, is in fact deeply flawed, with problems in sample size and selection, methodology and data analysis, and experimenter bias. The studies have never been replicated, yet they continue to be cited without question in professional journals, psychology textbooks, and the popular press as "evidence" of the creativity and madness connection.
No References for this article.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Miscellaneous

Affiliations: Pace University, New York

Publication date: 2002-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more