Skip to main content

Free Content The End of Neo-Kraepelinism

Download Article:
 Download
(PDF 252.306640625 kb)
 
In 1980, the American Psychiatric Association asserted that its subject matter was straight-forwardly medical and created a diagnostic manual— Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.; DSM-III)—consisting of supposedly discrete and independent mental disorders based on what were meant to be low-inference, easily observed sets of symptoms. It was taken for granted that such mental disorders existed and that biological research over time would unearth their specific somatic causes. The idea was to purge psychiatric diagnosis of jargon and unverified and unverifiable psychosocial theories of etiology and thereby place psychiatry on the road to discoveries regarding somatic pathology and causation that has proven so fruitful in the rest of medicine. When DSM-5 is published in 2013, however, biological information about the individual being diagnosed will play the same role as it did in DSM-III—namely, nothing. This article summarizes why adopting medicine as a model for conceptualizing personal distress and social difficulties was and is na├»ve and misguided. It is time for the mental health industry to stop pretending that psychological difficulties can be reduced to morbid physiology.

4 References.

No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: NEO-KRAEPELINISM; PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS; REDUCTIONISM; SCIENTISM

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2012-08-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more