Skip to main content

Free Content Why Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Is Not a True Medical Syndrome

Download Article:
 Download
(PDF 314.3 kb)
 
Critics of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have repeatedly argued that there is no proof for the condition being symptomatic of an organic brain disease and that the current "ADHD epidemic" is an expression of medicalization. To this, the supporters of ADHD can retort that the condition is only defined as a mental disorder and not a physical disease. As such, ADHD needs only be a harmful mental dysfunction, which, like other genuine disorders, can have a complex and obscure etiology. This article argues that such a line of argument fails to save ADHD as a valid diagnostic category. Given the general diagnostic logic of the DSM–IV and how ADHD has been defined in terms of everyday (male) child behaviors, there are compelling grounds to disbelieve that ADHD can be a true medical syndrome united by some type of harmful dysfunction. Indeed, strong logical and empirical reasons will be adduced to show that people may qualify for ADHD diagnosis without suffering from any type of underlying pathology.

18 References.

No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: ADHD; CONCEPT OF DISORDER; CONCEPT OF SYNDROME; DSM-IV; UNDERLYING CAUSES

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 April 2012

More about this publication?
  • Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry is no longer available to subscribers on Ingenta Connect. Please go to http://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrehpp to access your online subscription to Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry.
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more