Is a Correct Psychiatric Diagnosis Possible? Major Depressive Disorder as a Case in Point
The desire on the part of American psychiatry in the 1970s to "rejoin medicine" resulted in DSM–III and subsequent editions. The form of medical conditions is imitated as closely as possible by listing criteria symptom sets for supposedly discrete, autonomous clinical entities, although relevant biological phenomena remain conspicuously lacking. As in somatic medicine, symptoms are unconnected to social background, history, context, and so on. But the necessity to interpret what people say and to depict behavior as the basis for diagnosis inevitably leads to intractable problems of meaning and evidence, as illustrated by a close examination of Major Depressive Episode. Plausible description and understanding of personal problems requires patient-supplied depiction of the nature and scope of the problem, history, and context, and when these are fleshed-out clinical entities and the usefulness of mental disorder disappear.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2009-08-01
More about this publication?
- Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry seeks to raise the level of scientific knowledge and ethical discourse, while empowering professionals who are devoted to principled human sciences and services unsullied by professional and economic interests.
- Information for Authors
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- Free Sample Issue
- Subscribe to this Journal
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites