PERCEPTIONS OF FAIRNESS IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM: A CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON
Research comparing the adversarial and inquisitorial justice systems has consisted primarily of American participants reading descriptions of each system in their “pure” form, rather than descriptions that allow for the flexibility with which these systems are actually employed.
In this study, participants from the Netherlands and the United States read short, realistic descriptions of each system and answered questions about the fairness of both procedures. Results indicated that while the adversarial system was rated significantly higher on the likelihood that all
evidence will be presented, and the likelihood that both the victim and the defendant will get an opportunity to voice their cases, people showed a clear preference for their own system. This bias toward one justice system over another may be due to the cultural values reflected in each system.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 01 January 2003
- The Journal's core purpose is scientific communication in the disciplines of Social Psychology, Developmental and Personality Psychology
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Terms & Conditions
- Contact the Publisher
- Search
- Manuscript Guidelines
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content