Skip to main content


Buy Article:

$39.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

An experiment was conducted to investigate the interactive effects of the physical attractiveness of hypothetical defendants and mock jurors on judicial decisions. Seventy-eight college students rated their own physical attractiveness and then evaluated attractive, moderately attractive, and unattractive defendants as to the defendants' guilt or innocence, responsibility for the charges being brought, trustworthiness, happiness, honesty, intelligence, and likeability as well as recommended punishment for those convicted. As expected, more as opposed to less attractive defendants were convicted less, punished less severely, rated as less responsible for the charges being brought, happy, likeable, and trustworthy. Attractive subjects were more likely to convict than acquit unattractive defendants, while less attractive subjects did not differentially convict or acquit defendants across all levels of defendant physical attractiveness. Both attractive and less attractive subjects recommended the least severe punishment for attractive defendants; however, attractive subjects were harshest on unattractive defendants, while unattractive subjects were harshest on moderately attractive defendants. The results are discussed in terms of leniency effects when judging others with similar attributes.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 January 1988

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more