A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE FOR BIRTH ORDER DIFFERENCES IN ANXIETY AND AFFILIATION IN STRESSFUL SITUATIONS
The review examines two commonly held views: first, that firstborns become more anxious than laterborns in stressful situations; secondly, that firstborns, more than laterborn individuals, seek the company of others in stressful situations. It appears that these notions are too generalized and should be qualified. The birth order literature does not distinguish between state anxiety and anxiety as a trait. Contrary to some suggestions, there is no evidence for birth order differences in trait-anxiety. However, there are indications that in some threatening situations firstborn females report higher levels of state anxiety than laterborn females. The evidence concerning males is equivocal. Some operational definitions of “affiliation” lack clarity and generality. Birth order differences in affiliation are found only among females and only in stressful circumstances which arouse greater anxiety among firstborn than among laterborn females. This finding suggests that the firstborn females affiliate in order to reduce anxiety rather than to engage in social comparison of emotions, as originally suggested by Schachter (1959).
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 01 January 1978
More about this publication?
- The Journal's core purpose is scientific communication in the disciplines of Social Psychology, Developmental and Personality Psychology
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Terms & Conditions
- Contact the Publisher
- Manuscript Guidelines
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites