EXTREME DISSENT, CONFORMITY REDUCTION AND THE BASES OF SOCIAL INFLUENCE
This study investigated how “correct” and “incorrect” dissenters from erroneous group consensus affect conformity on visual and opinion stimuli under normative and informational social pressure. Subjects were female undergraduates exposed to group pressure in a Tuddenbam-type electrical signaling apparatus. Results indicated that the relative impact on con-fortuity of “correct” and “incorrect” dissenters was not significantly affected by type of social pressure. Regardless of social pressure, a dissenter giving correct, or popular, answers (social supporter) reduced conformity significantly on both types of stimuli, compared with a unanimous condition. However, a dissenter answering even more incorrectly than the erroneous majority (extreme dissenter) reduced conformity significantly only on visual items. Results, though consistent with earlier data, cast doubt on the generality of a recent interpretation by Allen and Levine (1968, 1969) of dissenter efficacy on visual items.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 1975-01-01
More about this publication?
- The Journal's core purpose is scientific communication in the disciplines of Social Psychology, Developmental and Personality Psychology
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Terms & Conditions
- Contact the Publisher
- Manuscript Guidelines
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites