Skip to main content

JUDGEMENTS OF AGGRESSION SERVING PERSONAL VERSUS PROSOCIAL PURPOSES

Buy Article:

$39.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Two studies using a university and a high school population were conducted in which subjects read a transcript of an interview including a description of an aggressive incident. The aggressor was attractive or unattractive, and his intentions in aggressing were either to hurt the victim (hostile aggression), to return a wallet to its rightful owner (social-instrumental) or to keep the wallet for himself (personal-instrumental). Subjects evaluated the aggressor on several dimensions. The results of both studies indicated that the manipulations were successful. Moreover, in both studies subjects evaluated the attractive aggressor as more right and less deserving of punishment than the unattractive aggressor. Both university and high school students judged an aggressor who hit for pro-social instrumental reasons as more right and less deserving of punishment than an aggressor who hit for personal reasons. For university students both hostile and personal-instrumental aggression were evaluated similarly. However, high school subjects evaluated an aggressor who hit for personal-instrumental reasons as more wrong and deserving of more punishment than an aggressor who hit for hostile reasons.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 1975-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more