If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Fluorescence Spectroscopy for Rapid Detection and Classification of Bacterial Pathogens

$29.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:


This study deals with the rapid detection and differentiation of Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter, which are the most commonly identified commensal and pathogenic bacteria in foods, using fluorescence spectroscopy and multivariate analysis. Each bacterial sample cultured under controlled conditions was diluted in physiologic saline for analysis. Fluorescence spectra were collected over a range of 200–700 nm with 0.5 nm intervals on the PerkinElmer Fluorescence Spectrometer. The synchronous scan technique was employed to find the optimum excitation (λex) and emission (λem) wavelengths for individual bacteria with the wavelength interval (Δλ) being varied from 10 to 200 nm. The synchronous spectra and two-dimensional plots showed two maximum λex values at 225 nm and 280 nm and one maximum λem at 335–345 nm (λem = λex + Δλ), which correspond to the λex = 225 nm, Δλ = 110–120 nm, and λex = 280 nm, Δλ = 60–65 nm. For all three bacterial genera, the same synchronous scan results were obtained. The emission spectra from the three bacteria groups were very similar, creating difficulty in classification. However, the application of principal component analysis (PCA) to the fluorescence spectra resulted in successful classification of the bacteria by their genus as well as determining their concentration. The detection limit was approximately 103–104 cells/mL for each bacterial sample. These results demonstrated that fluorescence spectroscopy, when coupled with PCA processing, has the potential to detect and to classify bacterial pathogens in liquids. The methology is rapid (>10 min), inexpensive, and requires minimal sample preparation compared to standard analytical methods for bacterial detection.


Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1366/000370209789806993

Affiliations: 1: Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, ARS, USDA, P.O. Box 5677, Athens, Georgia 30605; Univerisity of Georgia, Department of Chemistry, Athens, GA 30605, USA 2: Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, ARS, USDA, P.O. Box 5677, Athens, Georgia 30605; Light Light Solutions, LLC, P.O. Box 81486, Athens, GA 30608-1486, USA 3: Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, ARS, USDA, P.O. Box 5677, Athens, Georgia 30605

Publication date: November 1, 2009

More about this publication?
Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more