Examination of Some Misconceptions About Near-Infrared Analysis

$29.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:


There are some recurrent misconceptions about near-infrared (near-IR or NIR) analysis and similar chemometric techniques that have resurfaced as this technology has become more popular and widely used. These misconceptions are that (1) near-IR can never perform better than the primary reference technique from which it was calibrated, (2) near-IR models that are linear in absorbance cannot account for nonlinear effects, and (3) bias and skew adjustments are purely mathematical manipulations without physical assumptions. This paper examines how these misconceptions arise and, using real and synthetic spectra and simulated noise, presents counter examples to them. This paper also shows how one can approximate a change of scale using bias and skew adjustments to the model and lists some conditions on a model's coefficient weights that make a model insensitive to small changes in spectrometer response.

Keywords: Bias and skew; Modeling; Near-infrared analysis; Noise; Nonlinearity

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1366/0003702953963247

Affiliations: Core Laboratories, Research and Development, 5295 Hollister Road, Houston, Texas 77040

Publication date: January 1, 1995

More about this publication?
Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more