Causal Reasoning Processes of People Affected by Wildfire: Implications for Agency-Community Interactions and Communication Strategies

Authors: Carroll, Matthew S.1; Kumagai, Yoshitaka2; Daniels, Steven E.3; Bliss, John C.4; Edwards, John A.5

Source: Western Journal of Applied Forestry, Volume 19, Number 3, July 2004 , pp. 184-194(11)

Publisher: Society of American Foresters

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Fire officials are dismayed when victims of wildfire blame fire fighters and others responsible for fire management for damage resulting from uncontrolled fires. This is in spite of the fact that wildfire damage is a consequence of dynamic interactions among natural factors (wind, temperature, location of wildfire, topography, etc.) and human factors (past land management, promptness of firefighting activities, extent of homeowners' defensible space, etc.). Fire and land managers do not typically understand why and how the victims arrive at such oversimplified, and in some cases inaccurate, conclusions about wildfire causation. Attribution theory in social psychology provides a framework for understanding the mechanisms of these blaming processes. In this study, both quantitative and qualitative approaches were used to explore how people who live in wildfire hazard zones and experienced wildfire, perceive the causes of wildfire damage. In the spring of 1999, a prefire survey was conducted in the western slope of the Sierra Nevada Mountains, an area where numerous wildfires are recorded nearly every year. This was followed by a postfire survey in two communities that actually experienced a fire that season. In addition, qualitative interviews were carried out in these two affected communities. Results suggest that people who experienced wildfire tended to attribute the cause of wildfire damage to factors associated with fire officials and nature and did not attribute fire damage to their own actions (or inactions). The implications of these attributions are discussed as are recommendations for future fire education and communication. West. J. Appl. For. 19(3):184–194.

Keywords: Attribution; cause of wildfire; environmental management; forest; forest management; forest resources; forestry; forestry research; forestry science; natural resource management; natural resources; perceptional gap

Document Type: Regular Article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Natural Resource Sciences Washington State University Pullman WA 99164 Phone: (509) 335-2235;, Fax: (509) 335-7862, Email: carroll@mail.wsu.edu 2: Department of Natural Resource Sciences Washington State University Pullman WA 99164 3: Western Rural Development Center Utah State University Logan UT 84322 4: Department of Forest Resources Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331 5: Department of Psychology Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331

Publication date: July 1, 2004

More about this publication?
  • Each regional journal of applied forestry focuses on research, practice, and techniques targeted to foresters and allied professionals in specific regions of the United States and Canada. The Western Journal of Applied Forestry covers the western United States, including Alaska, and western Canada; WJAF will also consider manuscripts reporting research in northern Mexico that has potential application in the southwestern United States.
  • Membership Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page