Skip to main content

Damage to Residual Trees and Advance Regeneration from Skyline and Forwarder Yarding in Mixed-Conifer Stands of Northeastern Oregon

Buy Article:

$21.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Reducing the risk of occurrence of wildfire and outbreaks of insects and diseases through fuel reduction is a priority management objective on federal lands within the Blue Mountains in northeastern Oregon. Optimal methods to achieve desired levels of fuel in mixed conifer stands by mechanical means are as yet unknown. One factor essential in evaluating optimal fuel reduction methods is the damage to residual trees and advance regeneration associated with specific combinations of stand condition, prescription, and harvesting system. Residual stem damage on 12,899 stems was compared after partial cutting and yarding with either skyline or ground-based forwarder in mixed conifer stands of northeastern Oregon. There were 6,092 occurrences of damage on 4,074 stems after yarding; 4.1% of the damaged stems had crushed foliage, 15.4% had a broken terminal leader, 26.5% had broken branches, 28.9% were wrenched, 35.0% had scraped bark, and 38.9% had bole scars. Fir (Abies grandis and A. lasiocarpa) seedlings were more frequently damaged than nonfir (Larix occidentalis, Picea engelmannii, and Pinus contorta) seedlings, and the most frequent damage to fir seedlings occurred in units treated by the forwarder. More damage occurred to residual large trees during yarding than to seedlings. Forwarder yarding resulted in slightly more damage to trees than did skyline yarding. Wrenching was generally consistent between residual seedlings and trees. Scarring occurred more frequently to residual trees than to seedlings. Mean scar area per tree on those actually scarred was generally about 40 cm² on seedlings and 256 cm² on residual trees. Despite slight differences in stand damage, both yarding methods met the silviculture prescription of reducing fuel and protecting large western latch, Engelmann spruce, Douglas-fir, and lodgepole pine stems targeted for retention. This suggests that the decision by resource managers to use one method of yarding over the other should probably be based on considerations such as availability of equipment, costs, and soil impacts. West. J. Appl. For. 15(2):101-107.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 1401 Gekeler Lane, LaGrande, OR 97850, (541) 962-6530;, Fax: (541) 962-6504

Publication date: 2000-04-01

More about this publication?
  • Important Notice: SAF's journals are now published through partnership with the Oxford University Press. Access to archived material will be available here on the Ingenta website until March 31, 2018. For new material, please access the journals via OUP's website. Note that access via Ingenta will be permanently discontinued after March 31, 2018. Members requiring support to access SAF's journals via OUP's site should contact SAF's membership department for assistance.

    Each regional journal of applied forestry focuses on research, practice, and techniques targeted to foresters and allied professionals in specific regions of the United States and Canada. The Western Journal of Applied Forestry covers the western United States, including Alaska, and western Canada; WJAF will also consider manuscripts reporting research in northern Mexico that has potential application in the southwestern United States.
  • Membership Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more