If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email email@example.com
Forestry best management practices (BMP) recommendations for streamside management zones (SMZs) are based on limited data regarding SMZ width, partial harvests, and nutrient movements after forest fertilization. Agricultural fertilization is commonly linked to increased stream nutrients.
However, less is known about effectiveness of SMZ options for controlling nutrient movements after silvicultural fertilization. Diammonium phosphate and urea were applied to 12 subwatersheds in 3-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations in the Virginia Piedmont. Three replicates
of four SMZ treatments were superimposed on 12 subwatersheds in a previous SMZ harvest sediment study (7.6-m SMZ, 15.2-m SMZ thin, 15.2-m SMZ, and 30.5-m SMZ). Surface, near-surface, subsurface, and stream water samples were collected monthly for 1 year and analyzed for nitrate (), ammonium (), and orthophosphate (ortho-P). Transected measurements from streamside to fertilized plantations allowed interpretations
of spatial nutrient measurements across SMZs. When compared with wider SMZs, 7.6-m SMZs had 3‐10× surface water , 3‐6× near-surface water , and 1‐2× more stream water . No significant differences were detected for
for any SMZ treatment. The 15.2-m SMZ thin had small but significant increases (2‐8×) in surface runoff for ortho-P relative to other SMZ treatments, perhaps because of increased surface water movement along thinning corridors. Across all SMZ treatments, comparisons of stream
edges with fertilized stands indicated reductions of 33‐98%, reductions of 68‐97%, and ortho-P reductions
of 70‐98%. A 39% rainfall deficit during the study influenced results, but conventional SMZs ≥ 15.2 m protected streams from fertilization nutrient increases.
Each regional journal of applied forestry focuses on research, practice, and techniques targeted to foresters and allied professionals in specific regions of the United States and Canada. The Southern Journal of Applied Forestry covers an area from Virginia and Kentucky south to as far west as Oklahoma and east Texas.