Small Mammal Distributions Relative to Corridor Edges Within Intensively Managed Southern Pine Plantations

Authors: Campbell, Tyler A.1; Constantine, Nicole L.2; Baughman, William M.3; Harrington, Timothy B.4; Chapman, Brian R.5; Miller, Karl V.6

Source: Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Volume 29, Number 3, August 2005 , pp. 148-151(4)

Publisher: Society of American Foresters

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

We characterized small mammal communities in three loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) stands in the Lower Coastal Plain of South Carolina during June 1998–Aug. 2000 to investigate influence of corridor edges on small mammal distribution. We live-trapped small mammals in three regenerating stands following clearcutting. Harvested stands were bisected by 100-m-wide, 20–23-year-old pine corridors. During 47,040 trap nights, we recorded 907 captures of 661 individual small mammals. Species captured included southern short-tailed shrews (Blarina carolinensis), cotton mice (Peromyscus gossypinus), cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus), eastern harvest mice (Reithrodontomys humulis), marsh rice rats (Oryzomys palustris), and golden mice (Ochrotomys nuttalli). We did not observe an edge effect (i.e., preference or avoidance) in small mammal captures at the corridor edge. Rodent captures were greatest in harvested stands, declined near the edge of mature pine corridors, and were lowest within corridors. Shrew captures were generally greatest in mature pine corridors and least in the interior of harvested stands. Retention of mature pine corridors of only 100 m may maintain some small mammals (i.e., shrews) that would not occur if stands were completely harvested. South. J. Appl. For. 29(3):148–151.

Keywords: Corridor; Pinus taeda; South Carolina; ecosystem-based forestry; environmental management; forest; forest management; forest resources; forestry; forestry research; forestry science; intensive management; loblolly pine; natural resource management; natural resources; pine plantation; rodents; shrews; small mammals

Document Type: Regular Article

Affiliations: 1: USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center Texas A&M University-Kingsville Texas Field Station Kingsville TX 78363 Phone: (361) 593-2426;, Fax: (361) 593-3924, Email: tyler.a.campbell@aphis.usda.gov 2: Memorial High School Eau ClaireWI 54701 3: MeadWestvaco Corporation Forest Resources Division Summerville SC 29484 4: Pacific Northwest Research Station USDA Forest Service Olympia WA 98512 5: College of Arts and Sciences Sam Houston State University Huntsville TX 77341 6: Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602

Publication date: August 1, 2005

More about this publication?
  • Each regional journal of applied forestry focuses on research, practice, and techniques targeted to foresters and allied professionals in specific regions of the United States and Canada. The Southern Journal of Applied Forestry covers an area from Virginia and Kentucky south to as far west as Oklahoma and east Texas.
  • Membership Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page