Skip to main content

Planting Loblolly Pine and Sycamore vs. Natural Regeneration on a Bottomland Site

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Comparing the yields of a 30-year-old, naturally regenerated hard-wood stand and two 16-year-old artificially regenerated stands of sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) clearly demonstrates the superior yield (37 cords/ac) of the loblolly pine stand. The naturally regenerated hardwood stand yielded 30 cords/ac, while the sycamore plantation failed. An economic analysis shows that artificial regeneration of sycamore was not a viable investment due to site-selectivity and high establishment costs. Natural regeneration of hardwoods yields significantly lower returns than planting loblolly pine but could be considered a viable alternative on sites requiring intensive site preparation prior to planting pine. South. J. Appl. For. 13(1):22-25.

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Leaf River Forest Products, Inc., P.O. Box 329, New Augusta, MS 39462

Publication date: February 1, 1989

More about this publication?
  • Each regional journal of applied forestry focuses on research, practice, and techniques targeted to foresters and allied professionals in specific regions of the United States and Canada. The Southern Journal of Applied Forestry covers an area from Virginia and Kentucky south to as far west as Oklahoma and east Texas.
  • Membership Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
saf/sjaf/1989/00000013/00000001/art00008
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more