Skip to main content

Comparison of Formulas for Estimating Volumes of Butt Logs of Appalachian Hardwoods

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


A database comprising measurements of over 700 trees and logs of Appalachian hardwoods was used to compare the performance of five formulas (Newton, Huber, Smalian, Bruce, and that of the centroid method)for estimating the volumes of butt logs. In terms of bias and precision, the centroid method was clearly superior to all other methods. Bruce's formula performed better than Smalian's formula and is recommended for use when only the ends of butt logs are accessible for measuring diameter, as in log stacks. North. J. Appl. For. 13(1): 5-7.

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37901-1071

Publication date: 1996-03-01

More about this publication?
  • Each regional journal of applied forestry focuses on research, practice, and techniques targeted to foresters and allied professionals in specific regions of the United States and Canada. The Northern Journal of Applied Forestry covers northeastern, midwestern, and boreal forests in the United States and Canada.
  • Membership Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more