Revealing Motivations for and Conflicts Associated with Recreational Horseback Trail Riding
Despite a long history of recreational horseback trail riding on public lands, relatively little is known about riders or their recreational experiences outside of wilderness. Because horseback trail riding is projected to grow significantly in the next decade and is often experienced on multiple-use trails, information about horseback recreational rider experience is of interest. A mail questionnaire sent to recreational horseback trail riders in Minnesota revealed that motivations for riding were similar to those of other outdoor recreationists. Nearly one-half of riders experienced something that interfered with their recreation experience, and, of those, half indicated that it was stressful and responded by group discussions and following trail riding etiquette. However, nearly one-fifth left the area due to the interference. Opportunities exist to minimize these interfering occurrences identified as conflict and to continue to educate all trail users on appropriate etiquette toward safe and satisfying recreation experiences.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2013-07-01
More about this publication?
- The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.
2016 Impact Factor: 1.675 (Rank 20/64 in forestry)
Average time from submission to first decision: 39.6 days*
June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017
Also published by SAF:
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- SAF Convention Abstracts
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites