Applying Lessons from the United States in Developing Canada's Forest Inventory: A Review
Canada and the United States have each introduced continuous forest inventory approaches over the past 10 years. A series of seven criteria are proposed to assess the ability of these inventories to provide high precision, useful data across multiple jurisdictions at reasonable cost. The Canadian inventory is undertaken by both federal and provincial agencies and measured on a 10-year cycle compared with a 5-year cycle used in the United States. Sampling intensity in the United States is significantly higher than in Canada. The accessibility of US data via the Web was much greater than in Canada, because of the wider array of tools and report options available. The Canadian system, although less expensive, has sampled considerably fewer trees, and that impacts data precision and resolution. Accessibility of Canadian data is deficient compared with the US system. The Canadian inventory should consider increasing sampling and improving access to data to match US development.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Review Article
Publication date: 2013-01-01
2016 Impact Factor: 1.675 (Rank 20/64 in forestry)
Average time from submission to first decision: 39.6 days*
June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017
Also published by SAF:
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- SAF Convention Abstracts
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites