Skip to main content

Analytical Decisionmaking Considerations for Upgrading or Changing Geographic Information System Software

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


The analysis of a decision to change or upgrade geographical information systems (GIS) software can involve both quantitative and qualitative criteria. Although some aspects of changing or upgrading GIS can be financially valued, there are a number of intangible benefits and costs that are better assessed qualitatively. Thus, a benefit/cost analysis that recognizes both quantitative and qualitative criteria would be useful in considering the tradeoffs among the options considered. Two hypothetical case studies are provided to help people think through the analysis process. One involves a major upgrade in the version of software being used and the other involves a complete change in software to a free or low-cost set of tools. In considering both the quantitative and the qualitative aspects of a change in software, one can assess the tradeoffs that might arise.

Keywords: GIS; benefit/cost analysis; intangible benefits

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2010-07-01

More about this publication?
  • The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.

    2015 2016 Impact Factor: 1.675 (Rank 20/64 in forestry)

    Average time from submission to first decision: 39.6 days*
    June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017

    Also published by SAF:
    Forest Science
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Podcasts
  • SAF Convention Abstracts
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more