Skip to main content

Comparability of Market Prices and Consumer Surplus for Resource Allocation Decisions

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

When a consistent theoretical structure is used for assessing the economic worth of different resources, monetary values assigned to nonmarketed outputs from forested lands (such as recreation) are comparable to market prices for marketed outputs. Microeconomic theory is used to determine when consumer surplus should be included as a part of the value assigned to a change in output. The exclusion or inclusion of consumer surplus depends on whether the change being considered is small or large relative to market demand. Combining information about the dollar value of outputs with similar information about costs facilitates economic efficiency analysis for the purpose of resource allocation decisions.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Economist, U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.

Publication date: 1985-02-01

More about this publication?
  • The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.

    2016 Impact Factor: 1.675 (Rank 20/64 in forestry)

    Average time from submission to first decision: 39.6 days*
    June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017

    Also published by SAF:
    Forest Science
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Podcasts
  • SAF Convention Abstracts
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more