Barriers to Coordinating Federal and State Resource Assessments in California
Abstract:A growing number of California's forest resource management problems have inseparable public and private components. Future sources of timber, cost-effective recreation supply, and cumulative impacts of public and private timber harvesting are three prime examples. Ideally, coordinating federal and state planning would be aimed at solving such problems. In practice, current efforts of the USDA Forest Service under the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act, as amended by the National Forest Management Act, and California's activities under its Forest Resources Assessment and Policy Act are falling far short. Coordinating federal and state resource planning will first require coordinating federal and state resource assessments. Currently, resource assessment is undertaken independently by each agency. Although coordinated assessment is an important first step, significant barriers stand in the way, including data gaps, institutional limitations, political obstacles, budget restrictions, and assessment timing.
Document Type: Journal Article
Affiliations: Forest Policy Analyst, Center for Natural Resource Studies, Berkeley, California 94710
Publication date: August 1, 1983
More about this publication?
- The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.
2015 Impact Factor: 1.476
Ranking: 22 of 66 in forestry
Also published by SAF:
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites