Skip to main content

Who Says you Can't Cut a Tree on Sites Growing 19 Cubic Feet?

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Bell and Randall (J. For. 80:152-156, 160) give little reason for thinking that planning under the Resources Planning Act defines the place of individual national forests in the country's timber supply situation. The timber strategy seems to be defined in terms of constraints, and at least in the Northeast these constraints serve to limit the area that could be allocated to wilderness.

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: State Economist, Maine State Planning Office, Augusta

Publication date: March 1, 1982

More about this publication?
  • The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.
  • Membership Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more