In Response to "RPA/NFMA--Time to Punt"
Abstract:In criticizing the Resources Planning Act (RPA) and the National Forest Management Act, Behan (Journal of Forestry 79:802--05) errs in thinking that repeal would reduce litigation over use of national forestlands. He errs again in holding that major controversies can be solved largely by local land managers. On the contrary, the legislation is beneficial. The planning it mandates, though costly, is helping national forest personnel to improve their management, and the data generated will increasingly provide a rational basis for deciding issues.
Document Type: Journal Article
Affiliations: Legislative Assistant to Sen. John Melcher of the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
Publication date: December 1, 1981
More about this publication?
- The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.
- Membership Information
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites