If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email firstname.lastname@example.org
Standards for appraising national forest stumpage developed early in the century by Austin Cary, W.B. Greeley, and James W. Girard were critically examined and explained by Julian E. Rothery some four decades ago in three significant articles. Rothery described the standard Forest Service methods, including the investment method, the overturn method, and a transaction evidence method. He suggested that several methods be tried before making the final selection based on the appraiser's judgment. He also suggested how to reconcile differences (in a stable market) between lump-sum sales and pay-as-cut sales, using a discount factor to equate the latter with the former. Since Rothery's solutions did not anticipate nonstable markets, some modification would seem necessary in the light of current inflation, by developing a "lump-sum equivalent" through the use of an inflation factor to set off against the discount factor.
The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.