Skip to main content

Power Requirements of Three Cable Logging Systems

Buy Article:

$21.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Systems that may be used for highlead yarding in the eastern United States have power requirements that differ according to the mechanical characteristics of the yarder and rigging arrangement. A study compared the conventional highlead system with two running skylines employing chokers, the Grabinski and the Purdue traction-cable. Both of these skyline systems have a rider block on the haul-back line to increase lifting capabilities. In the conventional and Grabinski systems, running-line tension to lift the lead end of the log was controlled with drum brakes. In the Purdue system, which was used to simulate a yarder having a drum interlocking mechanism for regulating running-line tension without the use of brakes, lift was controlled by installing, at the yarder, a sheave through which the haulback line had been threaded.

With running-line tension controlled by brakes, input energy efficiency of the Grabinski increased with size of load; the maximum load tested required 36 percent less power than the conventional system. When the two rider-block systems were compared, the drum interlock was the more efficient as the load increased. For the maximum test load, power requirements were 24 and 51 percent less than for the Grabinski and conventional. These percentages would be expected to vary with load size and terrain.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Associate Professor of Forestry, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Publication date: 1980-10-01

More about this publication?
  • Important Notice: SAF's journals are now published through partnership with the Oxford University Press. Access to archived material will be available here on the Ingenta website until March 31, 2018. For new material, please access the journals via OUP's website. Note that access via Ingenta will be permanently discontinued after March 31, 2018. Members requiring support to access SAF's journals via OUP's site should contact SAF's membership department for assistance.

    The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.

    2016 Impact Factor: 1.675 (Rank 20/64 in forestry)

    Average time from submission to first decision: 39.6 days*
    June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017

    Also published by SAF:
    Forest Science
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Podcasts
  • SAF Convention Abstracts
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more