Benefit - Cost Analysis in Recreation: A Reply to Critics
Abstract:The evaluation of recreation benefits should not be viewed as a formidable task. Clarification is provided for previous discussion of requirements for data and expertise, consistency in benefit evaluation, and the conceptual specification of recreation demand.
Document Type: Journal Article
Affiliations: Research Forester, North Central Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Chicago, Illinois
Publication date: January 1, 1980
More about this publication?
- The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.
- Membership Information
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites