The Monongahela Controversy and the Political Process
Authors: Fairfax, Sally K.; Achterman, Gail L.
Source: Journal of Forestry, Volume 75, Number 8, 1 August 1977 , pp. 485-487(3)
Publisher: Society of American Foresters
Abstract:Misinterpretations of the Monongahela controversy obscure important lessons which that experience should teach us about the political process. Forest policy is debated continually in a variety of arenas. Foresters must be aware of the process and the nature of the different forums if they are to be effective participants in the deliberations.
Document Type: Journal Article
Affiliations: Member, Oregon State Bar
Publication date: August 1, 1977
- The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.
- Membership Information
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites