Comprehensive Analysis of Public Forestry Project and Program Alternatives
Financial analysis has not been widely used in public forest management planning in the United States because its restricted point of view frequently is inappropriate. This article suggests a system of comprehensive analysis, which identifies seven different characteristics of forestry project and program alternatives, as an improved basis for decision-making. The seven collateral criteria, and the analysis procedure, are discussed.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Journal Article
Affiliations: Professor of Forestry and Resource Development, Michigan State University, East Lansing
Publication date: 1975-11-01
2016 Impact Factor: 1.675 (Rank 20/64 in forestry)
Average time from submission to first decision: 39.6 days*
June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017
Also published by SAF:
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- SAF Convention Abstracts
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites