Skip to main content

The Jones Act and the Douglas-fir Region Softwood Lumber Industry in Perspective

The full text article is temporarily unavailable.

We apologise for the inconvenience. Please try again later.

Because of the Jones Act, foreign flagships cannot be used for intercoastal shipment of lumber in the United States. As a result, British Columbia producers have a transportation cost advantage in competing with west coast U.S. producers for east coast markets. In the context of the total competitive environment between the two areas, however, other factors--especially stumpage price differences--may override this advantage. If exempted from the Jones Act, Pacific Northwest softwood producers would have to prepare for assembly of cargo and development of east coast markets to take full advantage of lower-cost foreign flag vessels. Evaluation of the impact of the Jones Act should be within the context of the Act's objectives, the need for waterborne as opposed to other transportation modes, and the market forces which determine competition with British Columbia.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Principal Economist, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon

Publication date: 01 October 1975

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more