Skip to main content

Volume Tables vs. Dendrometers for Forest Surveys

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Substantial differences can exist in both cubic-foot and board-foot tree volumes arrived at by volume tables and by direct measurement on ponderosa pine with an optical dendrometer. Evidence to justify investigations of volume table bias in other species and geographical locations is provided.

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Mensurationist, Pac. NW Forest and Range Exp. Sta., U.S. Forest Serv., Portland, Ore.

Publication date: April 1, 1972

More about this publication?
  • The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.

    Also published by SAF:
    Forest Science
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more