Buying Artificial or Natural Christmas Trees?
Abstract:More than 1,800 households were sampled in 12 principal cities of six Intermountain states. Use of natural Christmas trees by state, ranged from 76.4 percent to 54.8 percent. For artificial trees the range was from 22.7 percent to 7.6 percent. Economy of using artificial Christmas trees was the major motivation for those who used them. Tradition was the major reason offered by natural tree users for their selection. Annual purchases of artificial Christmas trees seemed to be increasing. Recently, however, the rate of increase has lessened compared to the first years that such trees were on the market.
Document Type: Journal Article
Affiliations: Former Assistant State Forester, Utah Department of Forestry and Fire Control
Publication date: 1965-11-01
More about this publication?
- The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.
2015 Impact Factor: 1.476
Ranking: 22 of 66 in forestry
Also published by SAF:
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites