Skip to main content

The Bob Marshall Wilderness Area of Montana--Some Socio-Economic Considerations

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


The Bob Marshall Wilderness Area in the Flathead and Lewis and Clark National Forests, Montana, has been the subject of a three-year land use study to determine the best socio-economic use for the year 1960. Continued public ownership of the land and the perpetuation of wilderness reservation are assumed. The area, its history, and evolution are described, as well as some user characteristics. For this economic analysis of resource uses, isolation recreation under wilderness reservation was compared with developed recreation and hypothetical timber production under full-development multiple use. Other national forest uses, including water, wildlife, and range were assumed to be neutral. Two conjectural timber sales, evolved by using Forest Service appraisal methods, proved uneconomic. In terms of least public cost, it was shown that the public interest was best served, in 1960, by reserving the Bob Marshall Area as wilderness.

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Associate Professor of Forestry, Montana State University, Missoula

Publication date: November 1, 1964

More about this publication?
  • The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.

    2015 Impact Factor: 1.476
    Ranking: 22 of 66 in forestry

    Also published by SAF:
    Forest Science
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more