A Factual Analysis of the Quetico-Superior Controversy
Abstract:After reviewing the history of the Quetico-Superior project, the author comes to the conclusions (1) that the greater project embracing some 10 million acres in Minnesota and Ontario should be dropped, and (2) that interested organizations and individuals should concentrate their efforts on obtaining federal appropriations for the preservation of the roadless wilderness area in the Superior National Forest.
Document Type: Journal Article
Affiliations: Professor of Forestry, Yale School of Forestry and Past President, Society of American Foresters
Publication date: 1945-02-01
More about this publication?
- The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.
2015 Impact Factor: 1.476
Ranking: 22 of 66 in forestry
Average time from submission to first decision: 39.6 days*
June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017
Also published by SAF:
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- SAF Convention Abstracts
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites