Comments on an Example of Forest Taxation in New Hampshire as Compared with an Example in Sweden, by J. W. Toumey and Erik Lindeberg
Abstract:Mr. Murphy emphasizes the differences in market value depending on whether or not a forest property is managed on a sustained yield basis. He believes that since the bad market value situation is the result of a bad forest situation, the forest owners themselves have it in their own hands to cure both. He also calls attention to the considerable difference in cost of government in New Hampshire and Sweden and how it affects the tax rate.
Document Type: Journal Article
Affiliations: Forest Taxation Inquiry, Forest Service, Washington, D. C.
Publication date: 1930-10-01
More about this publication?
- The Journal of Forestry is the most widely circulated scholarly forestry journal in the world. In print since 1902, the Journal has received several national awards for excellence. The mission of the Journal of Forestry is to advance the profession of forestry by keeping forest management professionals informed about significant developments and ideas in the many facets of forestry: economics, education and communication, entomology and pathology, fire, forest ecology, geospatial technologies, history, international forestry, measurements, policy, recreation, silviculture, social sciences, soils and hydrology, urban and community forestry, utilization and engineering, and wildlife management. The Journal is published bimonthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November.
2015 Impact Factor: 1.476
Ranking: 22 of 66 in forestry
Average time from submission to first decision: 39.6 days*
June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017
Also published by SAF:
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- SAF Convention Abstracts
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites