Comparing Stem Volume Predictions of Coastal Douglas-Fir Stands in British Columbia Using a Simple Physiological Model and LiDAR Remote Sensing
Coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii spp. menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) is highly desirable for timber production and considered a critically important species in the Pacific Northwest of North America, occurring in some of the most globally productive forest. With changes in predicted climate within the region likely to result in warmer and longer growing seasons and potentially drier summer conditions, Douglas-fir is a key candidate for ongoing research. A number of new tools are available to estimate the productivity of Douglas-fir forests, including process-based models that allow predictions of growth based on underlying physiological principles rather than statistical models of past growth and advanced remote sensing tools that allow estimation and extrapolation of forest inventory variables over the landscape. In this paper, we use a suite of tools to predict standing volume in a Douglas-fir-dominated stand in coastal British Columbia. The approaches were applied over Malcolm Knapp Research Forest (MKRF) in British Columbia, Canada. A simple physiological model, Physiological Principles Predicting Growth (3-PG), was used to predict both gross and merchantable volume across the region, using spatial estimates of climatic variables at 25 m cell resolution. Using contemporary airborne light detection and ranging data (LiDAR), we also predicted standing volume using an area-based approach at 25 m over the same stands. Results indicated accurate predictions of stem volume from 3-PG (r 2=0.91, P < 0.01) and LiDAR (r 2=0.70, P < 0.01) despite a long time lag between plot measured volume and LiDAR acquisition. Interestingly, comparison of stem volume between the two approaches was also close (r 2=0.65, P < 0.01), indicating reasonable agreement between the fundamentally different approaches. At this fine, 25 m, spatial resolution, both sets of predictions have the potential to augment regional forest productivity assessments and offer insight into the future changes in productivity of the species, especially under a continuously changing climate.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2015-06-01
More about this publication?
- Important Notice: SAF's journals are now published through partnership with the Oxford University Press. Access to archived material will be available here on the Ingenta website until March 31, 2018. For new material, please access the journals via OUP's website. Note that access via Ingenta will be permanently discontinued after March 31, 2018. Members requiring support to access SAF's journals via OUP's site should contact SAF's membership department for assistance.
Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
2016 Impact Factor: 1.782 (Rank 17/64 in forestry)
Average time from submission to first decision: 62.5 days*
June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017
Also published by SAF:
Journal of Forestry
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites