Skip to main content

A Comparison of Model Forms for the Development of Height-Diameter Relationships in Even-Aged Stands

Buy Article:

$21.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Several model forms were analyzed to develop a height-diameter (h-d) relationship for even-aged, birch-dominated stands (8,454 h-d pairs of 198 plot-inventory combinations) in northwestern Spain. A basic model (which includes only d as predictor) and a generalized model (which also considers stand variables as regressors) were selected from among available models. Fixed and mixed forms of these models were evaluated. An approximate Bayesian estimator was used to obtain a calibrated response (prediction with fixed parameters and random effects) of the mixed models from prior height measurements of trees selected by different strategies. From a practical point of view, the calibrated basic mixed model is recommended if a randomly selected sample of 4‐11 trees is available or if only the 3 trees that are the diameter quartiles are measured. If the random sample includes more than 11 trees, the basic fixed model should be locally fitted, and the generalized fixed model is recommended when only dominant height is known. Finally, the predictions of the latter model may be outperformed by the calibrated generalized mixed model, which also requires inclusion of the height of the smaller diameter trees.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Betula pubescens Ehrh; Galicia; birch; calibration; mixed models

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2014-06-01

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2016 Impact Factor: 1.782 (Rank 17/64 in forestry)

    Average time from submission to first decision: 62.5 days*
    June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Podcasts
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more