Skip to main content

Effect of Undercut Style and Post Hinge Behavior in Tree Felling

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


This article reports the results from a preliminary field trial, and based on the rotation points found in the field trial, a dynamic model of a tree being felled with either a Humboldt, conventional, or open face undercut is developed. It was found that the holding wood does not completely break until the undercut closes, and the greatest potential for a kickback is when the tree is rotating about the second rotation point. When the tree is rotating about the second point, the slope of the lower face of the undercut has a strong effect on when the tree can begin to move away from the stump. For a given face angle, the tree is able to move away from the stump sooner after the holding wood breaks when a Humboldt undercut is used. Modeling indicates that the step in the backcut is more likely to be required as an anti-kickback measure when a conventional undercut is used. The complicated mechanical process of how the holding wood actually breaks is an area requiring further research, particularly with respect to how it is affected by the step height of the backcut.

Keywords: Humboldt; conventional; dynamic; open face; safety

Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: December 2, 2012

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2015 Impact Factor: 1.702
    Ranking: 16 of 66 in forestry

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more