Skip to main content

A Comparison of Three Field Sampling Methods to Estimate Soil Carbon Content

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Accurate estimates of soil carbon (C) contents over large spatial scales require extensive sampling and are susceptible to error associated with landscape variability. Various methods to minimize error have been posed, including conditioned Latin hypercube sampling (cLHS). The potential advantage of cLHS is that it uses existing ancillary landscape data in geographic information systems to select stratified random samples. Although the theoretical basis for cLHS has been demonstrated, few empirical evaluations have been performed. This study compared simple random, stratified random, and cLHS predictions of soil C content and their associated variability. A population of 903 gridded samples was collected and then subsampled based on stratification of curvature, slope, land cover, and soil type using 1, 5, 12, and 35% data set proportions. Random stratified and cLHS methods best approximated mean and variance of the population at sample sizes of 5 and 12%. Large advantages of cLHS relative to stratified random sampling were not apparent at this site, although cLHS consistently sampled the tails of the soil C content population distribution. Mapped soil C contents from the three sampling methods using regression kriging resulted in root mean square error (±SE) values of 11.1 ± 0.5, 13.4 ± 0.3, and 10.1 ± 0.2 Mg ha−1, respectively, for random, stratified, and cLHS sampling. Stratification sampling methods such as cLHS and stratified random sampling use existing ancillary information to provide an effective means for stratifying sampling locations within existing feature space and can offer improved spatial predictions of landscape-associated soil C contents.

Keywords: Latin hypercube sampling; digital soil mapping; regression kriging; soil survey

Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: 2012-10-01

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2015 Impact Factor: 1.702
    Ranking: 16 of 66 in forestry

    Average time from submission to first decision: 62.5 days*
    June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Podcasts
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more