Skip to main content

Modeling and Prediction of Tree Height‐Diameter Relationships Using Spatial Autoregressive Models

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Three spatial autoregressive models were applied to model the tree height‐diameter relationship, including spatial lag model (SLM), spatial error model (SEM), and spatial Durbin model (SDM), with ordinary least squares (OLS) as a benchmark. Five spatial weight matrices were used to evaluate the impacts of different weighting schemes on model fitting. It was evident that different schemes of spatial weight matrix strongly affected the model fitting and parameter estimation in these spatial autoregressive models. We found that the variogram or geostatistical weight matrix was superior to other spatial weight matrices such as contiguity, inverse distances, and local Gi * statistics. Further, the spatial autoregressive models were used to predict tree heights at unsampled locations. The results showed that the three spatial autoregressive models overperformed the OLS model not only in model fitting and reducing spatial dependence, but also in model predictions. In general, SDM and SEM performed significantly better than SLM, whereas SDM was slightly better than SEM in each aspect of model fitting and prediction. However, if the complexity of the model structure is a concern, SEM with a geostatistical weight matrix is a reasonable choice over SDM because SEM offers the model coefficient estimates close to those of the OLS model, which makes the interpretation and understanding of the model much easier.

Keywords: spatial Durbin model; spatial autocorrelation; spatial error model; spatial lag model; spatial weight matrix

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: June 1, 2011

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2015 Impact Factor: 1.702
    Ranking: 16 of 66 in forestry

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Partial Open Access Content
Partial Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more