Skip to main content

Tests of a Dynamic Programming-Based Heuristic for Scheduling Forest Core Area Production over Large Landscapes

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Potential simplifying assumptions are presented and tested for applying a heuristic model to schedule production of core area of older forest for the Chippewa National Forest in Minnesota, recognizing approximately 67,000 analysis units and 10 10-year planning periods. The model has strong ties to optimization modeling, utilizing dynamic programming to solve overlapping and linked subproblems. Emphasis of this research is on understanding tradeoffs between solution time and nearness to optimality when large landscapes are modeled. Results show that combinations of model-simplifying assumptions can help maintain an efficient balance between computation time and model optimality. Results are sensitive to values assumed for core area, suggesting that more spatial detail is recognized with higher core area values. Results are compared along an efficiency frontier, where improvements in either computation time or management schedule value cannot be achieved without a loss in the other. Understanding the tradeoff between optimality and computation efficiency is important for model use within a larger iterative system that integrates spatial values with aspatial, forestwide management constraints.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: dynamic programming; harvest scheduling; heuristics; landscape planning; spatial modeling

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2008-06-01

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2016 Impact Factor: 1.782 (Rank 17/64 in forestry)

    Average time from submission to first decision: 62.5 days*
    June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Podcasts
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more