Comparison of Fuzzy and Statistical Approaches in Multicriteria Decisionmaking
Abstract:Criteria used to measure ecological or social sustainability of forestry often include qualitative ones. Fuzzy additive weighting has been proposed for using qualitative data in the form of linguistic variables. It is, however, possible to formulate a linguistic problem also using statistical distributions. We compared the fuzzy and statistical approach in a linear additive weighting problem on a woodlot owned by UPM-Kymmene. The results of fuzzy additive weighting showed high uncertainty concerning the decision compared to the statistical approach. In fuzzy analysis, the best option was unclear and the risk involved in the decision seemed high, while in statistical analysis the best option was clear and the risks involved seemed negligible. The uncertainty present in the fuzzy approach did not correspond to the 95% confidence intervals, but rather to the extreme values of statistical analysis. It can be concluded that the fuzzy approach represents ignorance in the true criterion values, while the statistical approach represents variability in them. It can also be concluded that the fuzzy approach represents decisionmaking under uncertainty, while the statistical approach represents decisionmaking under risk. If probability distributions for the uncertain data can be obtained, the statistical approach is more useful. Otherwise, the fuzzy approach should be used.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2007-02-01
More about this publication?
- Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
2015 Impact Factor: 1.702
Ranking: 16 of 66 in forestry
Also published by SAF:
Journal of Forestry
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites