Skip to main content

Does Faustmann Rotation Apply to Fully Regulated Forests?

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Forest economics literature contains two lines of research in which the Faustmann rotation is taken to be invalid for continuous harvesting, i.e., for normal or fully regulated forests. As alternatives, a “marginal model for divisible forest capital” and a “regular profit model for timber production” have been proposed and applied. In contrast, recent forest economics has provided vast evidence that the Faustmann rotation is the long-term stationary state in rotation models with multiple age classes. In this article, we attempt to clear up this contradiction in the literature by showing that the two approaches deviating from the Faustmann approach yield the same rotation period. The deviations from the Faustmann approach are because the models are based on incorrect formulas for the value of a normal forest.

Keywords: Faustmann model; age classes; normal forest; optimal rotation

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Olli Tahvonen, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Unioninkatu 40 A, FIN-00170 Helsinki, Finland—Phone: +358 10 211 2210;, Fax: +358 10 211 2104 2: Esa-Jussi Viitala, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Unioninkatu 40 A, FIN-00170 Helsinki, Finland.

Publication date: January 1, 2006

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2015 Impact Factor: 1.702
    Ranking: 16 of 66 in forestry

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Partial Open Access Content
Partial Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more