Skip to main content

Incomplete Block Designs for Genetic Testing: Statistical Efficiencies with Missing Observations

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Missing observations are common in forest genetic field trials and are expected to reduce statistical efficiencies of any applied field designs. Such reductions could lower the presumed efficiency and other benefits of implementing any incomplete block designs (ICBs). In this study, we addressed this by computer simulation of a full-sib progeny trial with up to 20% of the observations missing. Four scenarios of missing observations (random, row, column, and genetic mortality) and tests of both clones and seedling families were examined. Two types of ICBs (alpha and no constraint) with single-tree plots, and their corresponding randomized complete block design (RCB), were considered on test sites with gradient and patchy environmental variation. Our simulations show that: (1) the statistical efficiencies of estimating family (or clone) means with both ICB and RCB were very sensitive to the percentage, not the scenarios, of missing observations examined; (2) the statistical efficiencies for both ICB and RCB were reduced as the number of missing observations increased, except in the cases of clonal genetic mortality; (3) the relative efficiency of ICB over RCB (at equal levels of missing observations) was reduced slightly as the level of missing observations increased; (4) the relative efficiencies for the seedling family tests were a little more sensitive to the levels of missing observations than those for the clonal tests, and; (5) the two ICBs showed little variation in the relative efficiencies across the missing observation scenarios and test conditions examined. Implications of these results for forest genetic field trials are discussed. For. Sci. 45(3):374-380.

Keywords: Incomplete block design; genetic testing; missing observations; mortality; simulation

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Professor of Statistics, Department of Statistics and Biometry, University of Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, Petermaritzburg, South Africa

Publication date: August 1, 1999

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2015 Impact Factor: 1.702
    Ranking: 16 of 66 in forestry

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Partial Open Access Content
Partial Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more