Observer Variation as a Source of Error in Assessments of Crown Condition Through Time
Data from the annual assessments of forest condition in Switzerland indicate that there are a number of problems with the collection of even the most basic information relating to forest condition. Of the 13 indices examined, 3 are assessed as continuous variables and 10 as categorical variables. In all cases, significant (P < 0.05) differences were found in 1 or more years between the field teams and the control team(s). For two measures of defoliation, these differences were present in all years. The assessment of the categorical variables was more reliable, but the differences indicate that the data must be treated with caution, even when only two or three relatively simple options are available to the surveyors. The surveyors involved in the work were all experienced foresters who had received a high level of training. The results suggest that many data related to forest measurement and assessment that have been reported in the literature cannot be reliably compared. The results also indicate an urgent need for the intensification of quality assurance work (training and subsequent checking) within the context of forest assessment. For. Sci. 41(2):235-254.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
Document Type: Journal Article
Affiliations: Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Publication date: 1995-05-01
More about this publication?
- Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
2016 Impact Factor: 1.782 (Rank 17/64 in forestry)
Average time from submission to first decision: 62.5 days*
June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017
Also published by SAF:
Journal of Forestry
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites