Critical Height Versus Importance Sampling for Log Volume: Does Critical Height Prevail?

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:


The estimator developed in Van Deusen (1987) is generalized to allow for unbiased estimation of log or tree volume using the critical height method. Comparisons are made with importance sampling (Gregoire et al. 1986) that suggest that the critical height method is more efficient and robust. The critical height method also requires fewer computations in the field. For. Sci. 36(4):930-938.

Keywords: Antithetic variates; control variates; taper function

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Mathematical Statistician, USDA Forest Service, Institute for Quantitative Studies, Southern Forest Experiment Station, 701 Loyola Ave., New Orleans, LA 70113

Publication date: December 1, 1990

More about this publication?
  • Membership Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more