Skip to main content

Ecological Implications of Loblolly Pine Regeneration for Small Mammal Communities

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Loblolly stands regenerated by the seed tree method (natural regeneration) and loblolly plantations were compared for differences in habitat and small mammal populations. Measurements were taken on 20 habitat variables that characterized the understory vegetation and gross habitat structure of each stand. Small mammals were collected by removal trapping during 1984 and 1985. Capture rates, expressed as the number of animals caught per 100 trap nights (TN), were higher in natural stands than in plantations overall and in 4 of 5 trap sessions. However, differences were not significant. The logarithm of capture rate was linearly related to age with a negative slope for each regeneration method, but was not statistically different between methods. Animal capture rates were correlated with habitat variables that declined with age. Changes in the trophic structure of the small mammal community are discussed. When sites are prepared by chopping and burning, small mammal populations respond similarly for both natural and artificial regeneration methods. For. Sci. 35(2):503-514.

Keywords: Natural regeneration; forest management; low intensity site preparation; trophic structure

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Professors of Forestry, Department of Forestry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29631

Publication date: 1989-06-01

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2015 Impact Factor: 1.702
    Ranking: 16 of 66 in forestry

    Average time from submission to first decision: 62.5 days*
    June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Podcasts
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more